For as long as I can remember, I
have attended church. As a kid, I
remember being told about stories in the Bible, so when I heard that we would
be reading the first twenty-three chapters of Exodus, I thought that this would
be a fairly easy assignment. However, as
I went through the reading I found that I was confused. There are things in the Bible that have and
still do confuse me, but I’ve never been confused about a Bible story that I’ve
heard a million times.
My first major point of confusion
was in Exodus 1:10 when the pharaoh says, “Come, let us deal shrewdly with them
[Israel], lest they multiply, and, if war breaks out, they join our enemies and
fight against us and escape from the land” (English Standard Version). The logic behind this really did not make
sense to me. If Israel was really so numerous
and strong, wouldn’t it behoove the Egyptians to become allies rather than
enemies? Later on, God unleashes ten
plagues over Egypt. These plagues
ruthlessly lay waste to the land and people of Egypt. I found myself wondering why Pharaoh would not
let the Israelites go after the first few plagues? I then remembered that God promised Moses that
He would “harden pharaoh’s heart” (Exodus 7:3a ESV). It seemed to me that God was controlling both
sides of this conflict. He was punishing
the Egyptians for not letting the Israelites go, but wasn’t giving them the
opportunity to let them go.
It was at this time that I also
wondered why God found it necessary to punish Egypt so brutally. As an aspiring engineer, my logical mind didn’t
understand this. Samuel C. Florman once
defined engineering as “the art or science of making practical” and this did
not seem very practical to me. If he is truly
all-powerful, couldn’t He have found a peaceful way to resolve the issues at
hand? In the midst of all these plagues,
God claims that “I may show these signs of mine among them, and that you may
tell in the hearing of your son and of your grandson how I have dealt harshly
with the Egyptians and what signs I have done among them, that you may know that
I am the LORD” (Exodus 10:1b-2). Then it
clicked. In ancient times, stories were
spoken and passed down through generations by tongue. No one would pass on stories of peaceful
resolutions, but rather mighty, divine displays power and deliverance. If God had resolved the problems peacefully
or prevented them altogether, I would not be reading about it today. Since this story has been passed down for
thousands of years, we all get to hear about God’s great power and we can know
that He is the Lord (just like the verse says).
Modern Christians tend to feel
uncomfortable with the Old Testament. Marilynne
Robinson acknowledges this in her book of essays When I Was a Child I Read Books.
She states that the Old Testament is treated as “greatly inferior to the
Gospels,” but continues to say that “the significance of the Old Testament cannot
be denied” (96). Robinson is completely
right in saying this. God uses the
Gospels to show his love for humanity, but his love means close to nothing
without an understanding of His infinite power which we can experience through the
Old Testament.
Landon, it is clear to see that you were engaging with the text as you read as you engaged with several different points of discussion in your post. 20/20 for depth. You made connections and critical points. 20/20 for scholarship. There were 1 or 2 issues with grammar but overall it was polished, 9/10.
ReplyDeleteTotal 49/50, nice job
Landon, I literally was struggling with the exact same part, the way God was controlling both sides. And you brought up that you think logically as an engineering major, I actually wrote about exactly that in my blog post, about reason and faith. If you would like to go read it and hear some of my thoughts on that, you're more than welcome to!
ReplyDeleteYou did a very good job thinking in depths and connecting your thoughts to the context. It was overall engaging and clear.
Depth: 19/20, you can add a bit more points of the reading to your post, I would be interested to see your thoughts on the other controversial topics.
Scholarship: 20/20
Polish: 19/20, a few minor mechanical errors, but overall clear and easy to read
Total: 48/50
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me:)