Imagine that you are playing a game of darts. It would be fairly easy for you to hit the dart board. Now imagine that you have been blindfolded and the board has been moved. Would you even attempt to throw the dart? Without having a goal or knowing where to aim, is it worth playing the game? Aristotle understood the importance of teleology, which is “the fact or character attributed to nature or natural processes of being directed toward an end or shaped by a purpose” (Merriam-Webster), to the human life and wrote on it in his work, The Nicomachean Ethics.
It is proposed that the end goal for humanity is a theoretical “supreme good”. When I read this, I immediately thought of the Law of Moses in the Old Testament of the Bible. But the next rational question is whether this high standard of good is attainable. In both the Biblical and ethical cases, I would say that it is not, but instead that it serves as a goal and a standard for our lives. We can know that this ultimate good is the goal of humanity as “the highest good is clearly something final” (Aristotle 13). This is teleology in its true form. The apprehension of this supreme good and understanding of its acquirement. Aristotle writes that “knowledge of this supreme good is of great importance for the conduct of life… we shall have a better chance of attaining what we want” (Aristotle 2). And what exactly is it that we as people want? Why happiness of course.
Happiness is the end goal for people. We want other things as a means to happiness, but we want happiness for what it actually is. But what exactly is happiness? According to Aristotle, “different people give different definitions of it” (Aristotle 5). As I am writing this, I would say that my definition of happiness is to have rest. Happiness is not rest, but I want rest as a means to happiness. Aristotle however, holds to a more sophisticated definition of happiness. It is a “certain kind of activity of the soul in accordance with virtue” (Aristotle 22).
If virtue leads to happiness, then we must understand what it means to be virtuous. There are two types of virtues. There are intellectual virtues (such as wisdom, intelligence, and prudence) and moral virtues (such as liberty and temperance). The possession of these virtues is what makes one virtuous, which is what leads to happiness according to Aristotle. Intellectual virtues are obtained by experience and teaching. Moral virtues, however, are obtained by practice. We strengthen them by exercising them.
So to return to the dartboard illustration, virtue is like taking aim at the dart board, which is happiness, and knowing that the goal is to hit the board is like teleology. If we have no goal, then we have no chance of attaining what we want (like happiness).
Landon,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog, and your analogy of the dart board really added interest to your post. Overall, I think you did well showing your knowledge of the reading as a whole and how that applied to you personally.
Depth: 20
Scholarship: 19 (I think you engaged with points in the text, but I would recommend adding more ties to other texts, like in your mention of the Bible, I would've liked to have read a verse reference) Just be sure to add this in your future posts! :)
Polish: 10
49/50 Great Job!
Hey Landon!
ReplyDeleteSorry, I got confused last week and accidentally graded the wrong blog!
You did well in getting to the heart of what Aristotle was saying! Your references were very relevant, and I would have loved to see them discussed in a more involved way. Maybe a sentence or two saying why that specific definition was relevant to the reading. I would have liked to see the Bible reference more explored as well. As it was left, it almost felt like your claim was that following the 10 commandments leads to salvation. While I understand and agree with what you were going for, more support would have strengthened your post.
Your dart-board analogy added a lot to the flow of the paper, and kept it easy to track along with. Good job, you can tell you read the Aristotle reading closely!
Depth: 17
Scholarship: 19
Polish: 9
45/50 Well done!